This article aims to respond to the claims Professor Fang-Chi Yang poses in her article. The analysis of the recent publications on communication and gender in Taiwan reveals that most of the research explores the problematic representations of genders while the issues other than media representations are seldom thematized here. Focusing on these characteristics pertaining to journal articles and graduate students' theses, this article raises the issue of the potential for emancipation conveyed by the research related to communication and gender and the need to further examine the methods adopted, the subjectivity targeted and also, last but not least, the alliance created by the researchers with similar interests who sustain the feminist tradition of reflexivity in delving into the practice of researchers and the research.