余貞誼

Chen-Yi Yu

未經同意散布性私密影像、性暴力連續體、框架、復仇式色情、數位性暴力

nonconsensual dissemination of intimate images, continuum of sexual violence, frame, revenge porn, digital sexual violence

擅自散布他人性私密影像的行動，在臺灣社會初始多以「復仇式色情」名之，後轉向「未經同意散布性私密影像」，接著則為「數位性暴力」。當現象的命名轉變，意味著其所指涉的槪念與文化基模的連結也會隨之轉變。本文同時收集新聞文本與 Dcard 的大眾輿論，來檢視媒介敍述在使用上述三種框架時，如何透過其所選擇與強調的面向帶出不同調性，並導引出不一的輿論氛圍。此分析將可協助我們看見命名政治如何導引甚或宰制我們對現象的理解。

The act of maliciously spreading other people’s intimate images was initially known as “revenge porn” in the Taiwanese society; it was later referred to as “nonconsensual dissemination of intimate images,” followed by “digital sexual violence.” Such changes in the naming of the phenomenon signify the changes in the connection between the concept involved and the cultural schema. This study analyzed news texts and public opinions from Dcard to examine how media narratives bring out different tones through the aspects they choose and emphasize to shape public opinions using the three mentioned frames. The results are expected to clarify how the politics of naming guide or dominate people’s understanding of a phenomenon.