This study adopted the affective events theory to examine the relationships among interpersonal conflicts, emotion, and communication strategies. A total of 30 intensive interviews were conducted on journalists in Taiwan, from which this study collected 155 conflict events. Data analysis categorized the 155 conflict events into 7 types: differing news value, lack of consideration, immoral behavior, unjust treatment, trying to interfere or control news, job incompetence and scooping or missing news. This study also found that respondents had different emotional intensities regarding the different types of conflict events, and different emotional intensities were associated with different types of communication strategies. For instance, the lack of consideration from a superior yielded significantly more soft emotions than differing news value from a superior did, and when respondents felt intense sadness during a conflict, they were more likely to use yielding as a communication strategy. Further findings are discussed in this paper.